Consider adding `doc(hidden)` to impl details?

Lokathor / bytemuck

A crate for mucking around with piles of bytes

https://docs.rs/bytemuck

Apache License 2.0

725 stars 79 forks source link

Consider adding `doc(hidden)` to impl details? #188

Closed crlf0710 closed 1 year ago

crlf0710 commented 1 year ago

Currently derive(Zeroable) add items within generated code, and they show up with cargo doc --document-private-items. Maybe consider adding doc(hidden) on them?

Lokathor commented 1 year ago

I'm not against the idea, seems harmless. Care to do the PR for it?