Closed ImUrX closed 3 years ago
should i continue in implementing Mul to other vectors? (+ splat)
That would be great.
Also, if you can impl Mul<simd> for scalar
so that the scalar value can be on the left side of the *
that would be handy. I think f32x4 has this sort of thing as an example.
will implement tests later
rustfmt returned Warning: the `merge_imports` option is deprecated. Use `imports_granularity=Crate` instead
Ah, yeah, the file is a little old but i usually have format-on-save set in VS Code so I forget the warning. I'll get it at some point.
Well it's done, and it doesnt seem like a breaking change :P
@Lokathor i dont have write access if you are waiting for that
Just wasn't sure if you were gonna add more :3
im gonna check some of the other issues later, but for now, im gonna end what i started in the project i was working on
Here we are, I implemented
i64x2
,i64x4
,u64x2
,u64x4
u32x4
u16x8
i64x2 * i64
Tests for all the types
i think we should implement multiplication in every type that can have it, better done now than later tbh
fixes #102