Bad revision history since v2.2.0.o

[totyaxy]

https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,34645.msg473819.html#msg473819

https://ibb.co/svxxcDy

I can't say much more than what I wrote on the forum. FPC: fixed, Lazarus 2.3.0 branch What can I write that will help?

Welcome @ FPCUPdeluxe. FPCUPdeluxe V2.2.0o for x86_64-win64-win32 Running on Win64-10.0.19045 Build with: FPC 3.2.2 on Win11 x86_64 CPU cores used: 4 Available physical memory: 8190 MB Current install directory: C:\lazarus Got settings from install directory. Please wait. Checking for updates. No updates found.

[LongDirtyAnimAlf]

Would you mind testing this new binary ? https://github.com/LongDirtyAnimAlf/fpcupdeluxe/releases/download/v2.2.0o/fpcupdeluxe-x86_64-win64.exe Thanks !

[totyaxy]

https://ibb.co/khT7k1q

[LongDirtyAnimAlf]

This one should be ok I hope. https://github.com/LongDirtyAnimAlf/fpcupdeluxe/releases/download/v2.2.0o/fpcupdeluxe-x86_64-win64.exe

[totyaxy]

https://ibb.co/WVyySWC

But if I look more closely, the column header is "hash", so it's good after all, isn't it? So there should be a column called "revision".

[LongDirtyAnimAlf]

Revision is something from the past, when SVN was still used. Now only (GIT) hashes are used. Anyhow. I will retract the current release 2.2.0o. And publish version 2.2.0p that has some more fixes besides this one. Thanks for testing.

[totyaxy]

Thank you too, but shouldn't I test it before release to make sure the "hash" will be good?

[LongDirtyAnimAlf]

Naturally, you are welcome to test. What do you need for testing ?

[totyaxy]

I only wrote with the help of a translator that before you release the "p" version, I would like to see if the hash (formerly: revision) display was good or not. (I could help with that).

[LongDirtyAnimAlf]

Fix implemented in release. https://github.com/LongDirtyAnimAlf/fpcupdeluxe/releases/tag/2.2.0p Closing.

[totyaxy]

https://ibb.co/2SNFpdr