Open kellyisworking opened 8 months ago
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.
Bump
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.
Bump
I confirmed that the glucose target guardrails are not respected when override values exceed the guardrail. Actually - I don't think this is a problem on the higher end. Next test will be low glucose end. Using a test phone:
The glucose safety limit is respected. So I think this is a cosmetic issue for the min target, but should be resolved. The upper limit of the target is used as entered. Not sure if we want to enforce guardrails on that value.
Using a test phone
Describe the bug During Custom Preset configuration, for both Saved and Custom (single use) Presets, the
Target Range
uses manual input for setting the low and high value. Low value can be entered as low as 0 mg/dL and high value can be raised as high as 400mg (at least).Given the low value is unconstrained, it is unclear if the dose will still be constrained by
Glucose Safety Limit
. Note: this should be investigated.Additionally the UI should introduce picker interactions rather than manual inputs consistent to
Correction Range
inTherapy Settings
to mitigate against use error. See below.To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior The UI should introduce picker interactions rather than manual inputs consistent to
Correction Range
inTherapy Settings
to mitigate against use error.<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
Minimum | Low Warning | High Warning | Maximum -- | -- | -- | -- 87 or Glucose Safety Limit | | | 250 mg/dL.Additionally, two recommendations to increase consistency:
Target Range
toCorrection Range
across the Preset interfaceDisplay warning message as user’s selection approaches high and low limits
Screenshots