Open nikhedonia opened 7 years ago
First of all: Congratulations for this awesome lib and also for the other projects, I really enjoyed the motivation for buckaroo and I hope to collaborate whenever possible!
Cool! I'm working on it. All right?
Just a question: Are we willing to make it possible to change wrapped value inside the loop? For instance: In the example, set x = 10?
If yes, it might make more sense to only allow iterations over auto const x
Are we willing to make it possible to change wrapped value inside the loop?
I don't like the idea of mutations. So the answer is no.
it might make more sense to only allow iterations over auto const x
I think in c++ we cannot enforce the const
when iterating by-value
but we can enforce it for by-reference
.
We also need to consider to overload begin/end
for the case where the maybe is a rvalue (temporary) or contains a move only type eg. unique_ptr
.
I'm not sure if for will extend the lifetime of a temporary until the end of the iteration. I guess a small test should reveal that quickly
First of all: Congratulations for this awesome lib and also for the other projects, I really enjoyed the motivation for buckaroo and I hope to collaborate whenever possible!
Thanks, this means a lot to us!
Cool! I'm working on it. All right?
Awesome!
A Maybe is a container like vector but has either 0 or 1 element. This would be convenient:
Functional maps should never have sideeffects. For sideeffects this way should be preferred.