Closed steveglen closed 5 years ago
My use case is NIPAP, most of its calls return
Response XML looks like this:
<array><data>
<value><struct>
<member>
<name>rt</name>
<value><nil /></value></member>
<member>
<name>total_addresses_v6</name>
<value><string>871509787656907713528983453696</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>total_addresses_v4</name>
<value><string>53276944</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>description</name>
<value><string>The default VRF, typically the Internet.</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>free_addresses_v6</name>
<value><string>866220736661138132752066936832</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>used_addresses_v6</name>
<value><string>5289050995769580776916516864</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>used_addresses_v4</name>
<value><string>13234488</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>tags</name>
<value><array><data>
</data></array></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>name</name>
<value><string>default</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>num_prefixes_v6</name>
<value><string>11679</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>avps</name>
<value><struct>
</struct></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>num_prefixes_v4</name>
<value><string>36705</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>id</name>
<value><int>0</int></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>free_addresses_v4</name>
<value><string>40042456</string></value>
</member>
</struct></value>
</data></array>
Please let me know if you need more info to reproduce
Also it looks like another of the pull requests you have deals with the serialisation?
I came from the latest version of CookComputing.XmlRpc (not the stable version) over to this codebase, in order to work with .net core, but this was a notable regression for me (it worked with the CookComputing codebase).
Also it looks like another of the pull requests you have deals with the serialisation?
I came from the latest version of CookComputing.XmlRpc (not the stable version) over to this codebase, in order to work with .net core, but this was a notable regression for me (it worked with the CookComputing codebase).
yeah, I'm sorry to read that. I really thought the stability was better than picking up on the beta version when I did convert the Cook's library into .netcore. Yes #11 is about serialization, which is good as complementary to this one. I think #13 should be ready this week with a simple unit test.
I'm also making use of this PR to configure circle ci on this project to auto-run the existing tests.
Hi,
I've just written a test but I'm afraid it's a bit too synthetic.