Closed MichaelCoulter closed 10 months ago
@jguides I believe has something along these lines for her spike sorting pipeline.
Yes. @MichaelCoulter I believe we talked about this about a year or so ago and @khl02007 came up with a solution that used the existing lab tables. You are more than welcome to use / adapt my tables if you would like.
Yes, I have been using this solution, thanks. It would be great if this could be made into a method as part of artifact detection so that it is more streamlined to do this for new data.
I think this can be done by either
IntervalList
, and use that for populating SpikeSorting
I would recommend 1 because then you don't have to filter and reference and save the recording for the one large sort group that contains all tetrodes.
Does this work? if yes, can we close this issue?
the first option might detect the same artifacts as the second option, but i think we would have to try it out in practice to see. you can close the issue and i can try to test this.
are you expecting both options to detect exactly the same artifacts, or artifacts that are pretty similar?
Since the artifact detection is done on an electrode-by-electrode basis, both method should lead to the same results (intervals with artifacts). Closing for now but feel free to reopen if you want to keep the discussion going.
it would be great to easily detect spike artifacts across multiple sort groups. currently, this requires making a new combined sort group manually and then detecting artifacts on that. it would be great if this was easier / built in.