search

Loriowar / redmine_issues_tree

Provides a tree view of the Redmine issues list
GNU General Public License v3.0
115 stars 72 forks source link

Connection is not possible in the tree view. #100

Closed yakkung closed 4 years ago

yakkung commented 4 years ago

In the case of a tree display, the following logs are continuously output to production.log.

   Rendered plugins / redmine_issues_tree / apps / views / issues_trees / _tree_node.html.erb (XX.Xms)

I'm having trouble connecting because of a proxy error. Remote connection to the server is also not possible. If it is set to normal display, log will not be output and connection will be made normally. Are there any countermeasures? Sorry for my weird English.

Loriowar commented 4 years ago

Hi. Can't understand the relation of proxy problem and with current plugin. There is no explicit log calls in the plugin. Moreover, I can't understand how plugin can affect on network layer. So, if possible, please, provide more details about Redmine configuration and about proxy problem with its configuratuni and logs.

yakkung commented 4 years ago

Thank you for your answer. Unless the plugin is writing logs, I think there is no problem with the plug-in. The root cause is probably the number of tickets (around 4000). I am sorry that I cannot provide specific information because it is related to customer service. Thank you very much.

Loriowar commented 4 years ago

Yea, lots of issues within a single node is a problem. There is no pagination in the plugin in the tree view. So, it can be slow, or raise an error due to lots of resources consumption and/or long network response. Details about pagination can be found in https://github.com/Loriowar/redmine_issues_tree/issues/3#issuecomment-139799782

shaphiro commented 2 years ago

Yea, lots of issues within a single node is a problem. There is no pagination in the plugin in the tree view. So, it can be slow, or raise an error due to lots of resources consumption and/or long network response. Details about pagination can be found in #3 (comment)

Regarding pagination is there any intention to develop an optimized version of this plugin? Thanks

Loriowar commented 2 years ago

@shaphiro this is a good question. First of all, as you might see, there are multiple way to implement such "optimized" version. So, no way to do a single solution for all possible use cases. That is why that task is not in priority. But, you're welcome to write a solution for your partocular case. Then, I can help with integration of it into the plugin.