Closed LoupVaillant closed 1 year ago
The incremental API will be gone by the next major version, making this issue no longer applicable.
The ability to implement an incremental interface on top of Monocypher will still be there, but the need is too niche and the API too complex to justify it any further. Users who really need an incremental API, or custom hash, can implement it themselves, or even ask me to help them.
Or
crypto_ed25519_ctx
. At least it should have thecrypto_ed25519
prefix for consistency.But that's for the next major version. In the mean time, the manual should be corrected (I just got bitten by the manual being wrong here, and for a while didn't understand why the compiler was mad at me).