Closed martinpaljak closed 2 years ago
Hello Martin, "many" readers are in fact rebranded. I fixed the problem in https://github.com/LudovicRousseau/CCID/commit/07aefeb8fd2f40eb5e8c7d9fd737c0a917a22721
You can see all the duplicates in the... "duplicates" section https://github.com/LudovicRousseau/CCID/blob/master/readers/supported_readers.txt#L1010
Thanks! Of course did not "see" the dups section... Interesting sidenote: this has also sneaked into usb.ids:
Bus 001 Device 009: ID 096e:0608 Feitian Technologies, Inc. SC Reader KP382
I have a Feitian R502 reader that suddenly became Avtors. This might explain:
https://github.com/LudovicRousseau/CCID/blob/b2927edae089987a37c6fbdd6291c316c02c4500/readers/Avtor_SC_Reader_KP382.txt#L1-L4
https://github.com/LudovicRousseau/CCID/blob/b2927edae089987a37c6fbdd6291c316c02c4500/readers/Feitian_R502-CL.txt#L1-L4
I don't know if this is some kind of "OEM" re-branding, but at least mine is definitely Feitian-branded, Feitian-sourced. I don't approve such "OEM-rebrandings" by the manufacturer (can this be "fixed" by re-flasing?), but CCID driver could have some kind of sanity checks for duplicate identifiers.
This is how pcsc-lite sees it on Debian bullseye: "Avtor SC Reader KP382 [R502 Contactless Reader] (D861F9281400061A) 01 00"