Open TaWald opened 2 months ago
Hi, many thanks for your attention to our work and sorry for my late reply. A similar issue was raised in https://github.com/Luffy03/VoCo/issues/15. Teacher-student is widely adopted in pre-training and is slightly better than our original implementation. It will be introduced in our new version of paper. In our augmentation, random filp/rotate is performed independently on each subcrop. I have not yet evaluated its importance, since we consider it as a basic setting. In general, random augmentation is also important in pre-training.
Dear researchers, our work is now available at Large-Scale-Medical, if you are still interested in this topic. Thank you very much for your attention to our work, it does encourage me a lot!
Hello,
I would like to integrate VoCo into my pretraining framework and have a few questions. Currently the repo seems to diverge from the method described in the paper as it does a teacher-student approach that is never mentioned in the paper. Q1: Where can I find the original implementation of the code from the paper? Is there an old branch I can checkout that holds this? Q2: How does the teacher-student setting affect overall performance? Is it needed to avoid feature collapse? Or why was it added? Q3: You seem to do additional augmentations on the subcrops independently of each other. Do I need to flip/rotate these subcrops independently? Did you experiment how on how important this independent augmentation is?
Cheers, Tassilo