tjorim
commented
10 months ago Should we not use the 23.3 tag as a base for the build instead of master? https://github.com/john30/ebusd/tree/23.3
Closed cociweb closed 10 months ago
tjorim
commented
10 months ago Should we not use the 23.3 tag as a base for the build instead of master? https://github.com/john30/ebusd/tree/23.3
cociweb
commented
10 months ago 23.3 is a little buggy. It cannot be compiled on alpine. Some additional includes are necessary for gcc13. amd64 is compiled properly above, but as of now I've stucked with the cross-compile stuff to arm/i386. And I also unsure about the possibility to pack all of them into one apk file.
tjorim
commented
10 months ago Good to know! Maybe it's better to build the package directly in the Dockerfile? That way it's open source and users can check the code instead of trusting a prebuilt package.
cociweb
commented
10 months ago Maybe (in longer term) we should consider to switch from alpine to debian base package. I know, that alpine fits perfectly to this project, but as I see ebus gets more priority/bandwidth from the maintainers on the debian platform.
PS: I will close this PR, since I won't have time in the near future (2-4 weeks) to make this temporal release workable on every arch.
A prebuilt version of the original Ebusd 23.3 based on the master branch code at 2024.01.23.
Note: It is highly recommend to revert the Dockerfile modifications and delete the temporal apk file from the ebusd/rootfs folder as soon as the 23.3-rc0 or the upcoming official version is released on the mainline!