Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Can you run IWYU with maximum verbosity and see if you can see what the basis
for its decision is?
$ include-what-you-use ../hc/hc.cpp --Xiwyu --verbose=7 ... the rest of your switches ...
Thanks!
Original comment by kim.gras...@gmail.com
on 22 Dec 2014 at 11:18
Oh, and what platform (OS/compiler/standard library) are you on?
Original comment by kim.gras...@gmail.com
on 23 Dec 2014 at 9:43
This was on Ubuntu 12.10 ... not sure what version of gcc/library I have on
that machine. I will update later.
Original comment by legal...@xmission.com
on 23 Dec 2014 at 2:32
$ g++ --version
g++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.2-2ubuntu1) 4.7.2
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
It appears to think I need ext/alloc_traits.h because of something in the
standard library. I have whatever standard library came with this gcc.
Original comment by legal...@xmission.com
on 23 Dec 2014 at 5:07
verbose output
Original comment by legal...@xmission.com
on 23 Dec 2014 at 5:08
Attachments:
I guess there are no symbols for <ext/alloc_traits.h> because of 80 characters
limit at
https://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/source/browse/trunk/iwyu_output.c
c#1655 And length of
#include <ext/alloc_traits.h> // for __alloc_traits<>::value_type
is 75.
Another issue is that we shouldn't have suggested to add <ext/alloc_traits.h>
for private symbol __alloc_traits.
Original comment by vsap...@gmail.com
on 25 Dec 2014 at 10:21
I think I'd rather see symbols truncated with ..., etc. instead of omitted
entirely in the output. At least then I'd have some clue why I'm supposed to
be including this header.
Do you want a separate ticket for the suggestion to include a header to resolve
an implementation symbol?
Original comment by legal...@xmission.com
on 25 Dec 2014 at 10:35
Makes sense. I think we can allow slightly longer lines when don't add ",
etc.". And truncating symbol with "..." seems to be better than omitting it.
> Do you want a separate ticket for the suggestion to include a header to
resolve an implementation symbol?
Yes, please submit a separate ticket.
Original comment by vsap...@gmail.com
on 25 Dec 2014 at 11:12
Extracted bug with ext/alloc_traits.h to issue #166.
Let this bug focus on the formatting.
Original comment by kim.gras...@gmail.com
on 3 Jan 2015 at 12:18
Original comment by kim.gras...@gmail.com
on 6 Apr 2015 at 3:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
legal...@xmission.com
on 22 Dec 2014 at 10:54