search

LumiSpy / lumispy

Luminescence data analysis with HyperSpy.
https://lumispy.org
GNU General Public License v3.0
25 stars 17 forks source link

Fix list formatting #176

Closed jlaehne closed 1 year ago

jlaehne commented 1 year ago

Description of the change

Fixing list in signal_tools.rst.

Progress of the PR

codecov-commenter commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (2a728cc) compared to base (cc5507b). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #176 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 12 12 Lines 545 545 ========================================= Hits 545 545 ``` Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LumiSpy). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LumiSpy)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

jlaehne commented 1 year ago

Hm, anyone an idea, why the list in https://lumispy--176.org.readthedocs.build/en/176/user_guide/signal_tools.html (peak identification) is not properly rendered, while it was OK on my local preview?

jordiferrero commented 1 year ago

Actually, all bullet lists are broken now in the documentation. It seems that it all started in #168... However, the only thing that changed linked to documentation is be in the setup.py where better formatting was changed. However, I have tried to revert this change in #178 and nothing has changed (lists still broken). So I am not sure. There is nothing else I can see obvious...