As @goerz mentioned in #64, DocumenterVitepress (unsurprisingly) serves larger webpages than Documenter.jl.
x@fedora:~/.julia/dev$ time curl https://chairmarks.lilithhafner.com/v1.0.2/tutorial/ | wc
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 19207 100 19207 0 0 185k 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 185k
62 1974 19207
real 0m0.113s
user 0m0.023s
sys 0m0.008s
x@fedora:~/.julia/dev$ time curl https://chairmarks.lilithhafner.com/v1.1.0/tutorial | wc
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 67571 100 67571 0 0 442k 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 442k
83 3221 67571
real 0m0.157s
user 0m0.014s
sys 0m0.006s
(Chairmarks v1.0.2 and below uses Dcoumenter.jl without Vitepress and 1.1.0 and above uses Documenter.jl and DocumenterVitepress.jl)
While some increase in page size is to be expected in exchange for fancier formatting, 3.5x is a large increase and perhaps it's worth auditing if it's possible to get that page size down.
As @goerz mentioned in #64, DocumenterVitepress (unsurprisingly) serves larger webpages than Documenter.jl.
(Chairmarks v1.0.2 and below uses Dcoumenter.jl without Vitepress and 1.1.0 and above uses Documenter.jl and DocumenterVitepress.jl)
While some increase in page size is to be expected in exchange for fancier formatting, 3.5x is a large increase and perhaps it's worth auditing if it's possible to get that page size down.