Open LilithHafner opened 3 months ago
Yeah I think Vitepress is not happy with the symlink. Will investigate...
oh... this is bad. I didn't noticed this extra step. IMO, we shouldn't mess with it, all because we want back the old pattern. And if at all, it should be optional, moving forward we should have the cleanUrls
as given by vitepress.
This is purely caused by deploydocs afaict
I guess we can provide a fixer function in deploydocs
like so:
which solves these problems? Not sure if that applies itself at the right time, though.
The readme link: https://luxdl.github.io/DocumenterVitepress.jl 301 Redirects to https://luxdl.github.io/DocumenterVitepress.jl/ which 200 redirects to https://luxdl.github.io/DocumenterVitepress.jl/stable/ which returns a webpage with status code 200, but this is the webpage: