Closed dcferreira closed 9 years ago
Merged most of the changes. The n -> N in formulas was incorrect.
In equation 6.17 in particular, n isn't defined. What I understood was that the gradient of layer n only depends on the layers after n (that is, from n to N), so the layer n-1 shouldn't be there.
Did I get this wrong?
Regarding Eq 6.17 and the definition of n/N, you are right I will make it more clear and take your n-1 -> N-1 suggestion.
Regarding the gradient question, are you referring to the typo you found in Eq. 6.32?. I had included that one.
My post was only about the n-1 -> N-1 subject. I think your commit is correct :)
Some corrections on chapter 6.4.1. Please double-check, in particular equations 6.31, 6.32 and 6.34, but I believe my changes are correct.