Closed gakshaygupta closed 4 years ago
Well I do not think n = T(lambda) and I realized it is not n and did not say it is n in the original answer due to this ambiguity. I want to reader to check his result with this reference.
However I do change the answer to make it at least handle this problem more generally.
well don't you think the introduction of the time in your formulation is a bit misleading as T(lambda) is a "half-life constant". And it just specifies the number of steps required to reduce the decay factor to half.
did you check my updated definition?
did you check my updated definition? Ohh sorry I didn't see the note at the bottom that's why I got confused.
the nth term of the GP is ar^(n-1) but you have mistakenly used a*r^n. Here n=T(lambda)