Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I'm guessing that the requested change may already be the case . . . we need to
verify this.
Original comment by guse...@datamininglab.com
on 2 Oct 2013 at 3:33
Original comment by guse...@datamininglab.com
on 2 Oct 2013 at 4:27
Original comment by guse...@datamininglab.com
on 2 Oct 2013 at 4:30
We can add an ignore for filename parsing, however it might make things easier
for future use if we add the properties file as something to specify on the
setup screen.
This would allow a user to browse to wherever the properties file is being
kept, thus avoiding manually moving properties files for each experiment.
Original comment by zach.br...@datamininglab.com
on 9 Oct 2013 at 6:48
That is a great suggestion! It would be helpful if we could include a number
in the properties file (i.e. "rhythm.properties-1") as well as a "properties
file specification appendage" (or something with a better name!) on the setup
screen. So, for example when we enter things like the subject number, etc.
there would be another box for "Properties file ID" into which we would enter
values like "1" or "23" and then the program would pull the properties from
"rhythm.properties-1" or "rhythm.properties-23"
Original comment by schutz.m...@gmail.com
on 18 Oct 2013 at 1:08
Zach -
Let's use 3 fields for this, wrapped in a box with name "Properties File":
1) binary option (radio buttons) --> Directory: () Use Data Directory () Use
Specified Directory
2) file browse field (text + browse button) enabled by second option above -->
[ ] [Browse...]
3) text field --> Properties File Version: [ ]
For the 3rd item, file names would satisfy: [experiment
name].properties-[version], where "version" could be any text
Original comment by guse...@datamininglab.com
on 18 Oct 2013 at 1:27
Original comment by guse...@datamininglab.com
on 18 Oct 2013 at 1:27
Properties file selection added in r191 - r195 builds.
Selection through new panel on setup screen. Loads a default properties file if
one is not specified.
Original comment by zach.br...@datamininglab.com
on 17 Mar 2014 at 6:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
guse...@datamininglab.com
on 2 Oct 2013 at 3:32