Open cfunk1210 opened 4 years ago
I prefer to sort citations in order of appearance, but that doesn't seem to be an option here.
\bibliographystyle{ieeetr} does that but without full names.
edit: per https://stackoverflow.com/a/6562312/3233339 , it's as simple as commenting out
ITERATE {presort}
SORT
in ieee_fullname.bst
By default, cvpr citations are sorted. Maybe, we should allow users to choose whether to have "compress" or "nocompress" for the cite package.
I mean citations inline.
I confirm \usepackage[sort,nocompress]{cite}
solves this problem. It should be included in the template.
I prefer to sort citations in order of appearance, but that doesn't seem to be an option here.
\bibliographystyle{ieeetr} does that but without full names.
edit: per https://stackoverflow.com/a/6562312/3233339 , it's as simple as commenting out
ITERATE {presort} SORT
in ieee_fullname.bst
I believe this is not the solution because it doesn't follow the CVPR style. I understand that the references need to be sorted by authors, and not in order of appearance. It is different thing what @cfunk1210 is referring, basically, to sort the citation lists into ascending order. For example, [4,10,6,1] to [1,4,6,10].
@pablospe is correct. This only refers to multiple citations within the paper. It shouldn't affect anything else and please don't make a change in the references sort rder.
请问文献顺序不对怎么解决的啊
请问文献顺序不对怎么解决的啊
官方并未规定顺序。所以不存在顺序不对的问题
Can we enable the cite package sorting in the cls? It always bugs me that people don't follow the rule of ordering the citation in ascending order. Looks like that rule might not be in the latest version of the pdf but it's really easy to do.
Just add
\usepackage[sort,nocompress]{cite}
to the cls.https://ctan.math.illinois.edu/macros/latex/contrib/cite/cite.pdf
Thanks