Open orbeckst opened 4 years ago
cc @lilyminium @richardjgowers @tylerjereddy
To clarify, are you suggesting that we need new asv
benchmarks to cover those improvements/parts of the code, or that we should expect to see them showing up soon?
We have to write new benchmarks.
Am 03.06.2020 um 19:15 schrieb Tyler Reddy notifications@github.com:
To clarify, are you suggesting that we need new asv benchmarks to cover those improvements/parts of the code, or that we should expect to see them showing up soon?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
There are now some benchmarks for .lib.distances.calc_dihedrals
. Does this close this issue?
With the merge of PR #2706 , the performance of the Ramachandran analysis tool improved markedly. It would be nice to see the improvements in the automatic performance benchmarks (see https://github.com/MDAnalysis/benchmarks with https://github.com/MDAnalysis/benchmarks/wiki).