Possible CI solution [PR #49 target]

[IAlibay]

Description

As discussed here is my solution (assuming CI doesn't complain) to the CI issues in PR #49

To do

• [ ] Remove extra branch in PR (currently used to test)

Status

• [ ] Ready to go

[pep8speaks]

Hello @IAlibay! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

• In the file setup.py:

Line 18:1: E722 do not use bare 'except'

Comment last updated at 2021-07-22 17:41:07 UTC

[IAlibay]

Ah yes, the ever so descriptive gh actions error messages: "Error when evaluating 'runs-on' for job 'test'. (Line: 25, Col: 14): Unexpected value ''

Sometimes I wonder if it's possible worse than awk's interpretor....

Apologies for the many commits as I work out what character I'm missing...

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #51 (3abd2d9) into issue46 (abe6ace) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

:exclamation: Current head 3abd2d9 differs from pull request most recent head fe65181. Consider uploading reports for the commit fe65181 to get more accurate results

[IAlibay]

hand-defining ubuntu works, now to see what's up with matrix.os...

There we go my bad, forgot to add an os entry to the extra test

[IAlibay]

@ojeda-e please do review & squash-merge when you want. After that #46 will probably be ok to merge.

[ojeda-e]

Thanks for your help @IAlibay. I definitely had missing pieces to solve this puzzle.