acknowledgements

[orbeckst]

@MDAnalysis/scipy2016 – please add acknowledgements to the draft (e.g. any grants that you get paid on). Double-check with your PI if necessary. It is often very important that all grant numbers are listed because this is one way in which successes of grants are measured.

(We can fix this in review but it's good to be complete from the start.)

Authors Acknowledgement TODO:

• [x] @richardjgowers
• [x] @kain88-de
• [x] @jbarnoud
• [x] @tylerjereddy
• [x] @mnmelo
• [x] @sseyler
• [x] @jandom
• [x] @dotsdl
• [x] @seb-buch
• [x] @ianmkenney
• [x] @orbeckst

[orbeckst]

ping @MDAnalysis/scipy2016 – please provide me with your language for the acknowledgements section

[richardjgowers]

With these do we want to split it by authors (RG was supported by xyz) or just list all numbers together (This work was in part supported by abc, xyz, etc(

[jandom]

Wait, what does this mean? Should we give like our PhD grant number that we're supported by?

• Jan

On 29 May 2016 at 11:06, Richard Gowers notifications@github.com wrote:

With these do we want to split it by authors (RG was supported by xyz) or just list all numbers together (This work was in part supported by abc, xyz, etc(

— You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MDAnalysis/scipy_proceedings/issues/16#issuecomment-222352784, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAYKmwmgmhK7c8bVIRkT3RiP_5Ibh_blks5qGWVBgaJpZM4IpP5k .

[orbeckst]

The personalized version of @richardjgowers is clearer than what I started with, so use

OB was supported in part by grant XYZ from the National Science Foundation.

[orbeckst]

@jandom : typically, yes but check with your PI. If unsure about the exact number, just say something along the lines of

JD was supported by the Wellcome Trust.

(or whatever and we fill in the gaps later.)

[kain88-de]

I edited the first post to track who already supplied information.

[orbeckst]

Good idea, thanks!

On 29 May, 2016, at 09:41, kain88-de notifications@github.com wrote:

I edited the first post to track who already supplied information.

Oliver Beckstein * orbeckst@gmx.net skype: orbeckst * orbeckst@gmail.com

[orbeckst]

Add acknowledgements in author order.

[orbeckst]

@seb-buch emailed me, he read it, and is happy with everything.

[orbeckst]

Groningen folks: @jbarnoud and @mnmelo – anything to add to acknowledgements?

If you have any other text snippets or figures that you'd like to see included, please open an issue quickly. PRs are most convenient but I can also work with text and attached figures...

[jbarnoud]

I asked my PI for what I need to add to the acknowledgements. It will most likely not get the answer before the submission deadline, though. Le 30 mai 2016 9:17 PM, Oliver Beckstein notifications@github.com a écrit :Groningen folks: @jbarnoud and @mnmelo – anything to add to acknowledgements?

If you have any other text snippets or figures that you'd like to see included, please open an issue quickly. PRs are most convenient but I can also work with text and attached figures...

—You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[orbeckst]

We can add it later.

On 30 May, 2016, at 12:39, Jonathan Barnoud notifications@github.com wrote:

I asked my PI for what I need to add to the acknowledgements. It will most likely not get the answer before the submission deadline, though.

Oliver Beckstein * orbeckst@gmx.net skype: orbeckst * orbeckst@gmail.com

[kain88-de]

Only @mnmelo is missing now.

[mnmelo]

I've just updated the draft. Should this be closed now?

[orbeckst]

Yes, I think you we're the last one. Please close.

Oliver Beckstein email: orbeckst@gmail.com

Am Jun 2, 2016 um 8:39 schrieb mnmelo notifications@github.com:

I've just updated the draft. Should this be closed now?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.