Closed eurunuela closed 3 years ago
Is this just an issue with the documentation? I noticed that I totally forgot to document the shape_3d
and mask_vec
parameters in the docstrings. Of course, we could re-evaluate those two arguments completely. They're hopefully just there until we solve #5, but if we can't get rid of the spatial elements then I think we can just pass around images (basically getting rid of the function and making the class behave that way).
I believe it's not a documentation issue. I'll open a draft PR so you can see what I mean.
This was fixed by changes to the core code in #19
While working on the integration test, I saw there is a little bug in the code that probably comes from losing the context we had in tedana.
Basically, we are not considering that the data has been masked when giving
shape3d
tofit_transform()
. We're currently giving the original dimensions when it should be the masked ones.Edit: The error comes from the fact that
apply_mask
from nilearn only keeps the values inside the mask, whilemapca
in tedana keeps everything.