Closed VincentVanlaer closed 2 weeks ago
This makes sense to me. Just have the sdk take care of lapack, since that's what we test and support, and remove 3rd party source code from Mesa. We should merge this PR if others agree
I agree in principle but this will break my ifort build until I switch it over to using the system LAPACK, which I should do anyway but might not have much time for ~2-3 weeks.
I think I managed to switch, though to using the Intel Math Kernel Library™ (MKL), which appears to break bit-for-bit in the mtx
, net
and num
tests, but the results look okay. I messed up my first run, which has contaminated TestHub with apparently mixed failures but I'll have a close look for discrepancies the next time I test main
.
But I think the bundled BLAS/LAPACK can go.
It is only used for non-sdk builds, and other required libraries (such as HDF5) are not included for non-sdk builds as well. Furthermore, this prevents the vendored version from being out of date with the SDK version.