Closed vitalJP closed 4 years ago
The relationship is a composite, so instead of adding an ID, I added the following element under the OperationsRecordTemplateType: <xsd:element name="RecordEntry' type="OperationsRecordEntryTemplateType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
Also found that the OperationsEvent/OperationsEventRecord was the wrong type. It was OperationsRecordEntryTemplateType, and should have been OperationsRecordTemplateType.
Confirmed that both changes have been made in the January-2020-Sprint branch. I'll circle back and Close this issue after the changes have been merged into Master.
Changed as marked above. Issue closed.
Add "OperationsRecordSpecTemplateID" and "OperationsRecordEntryTemplateID" elements to "OperationsRecordTemplateType" in Common.xsd to align with updated 950002 Operations Record Model
Solution "OperationsRecordTemplateType"
ADD element name="OperationsRecordEntryID" type="IdentifierType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> ADD element name="OperationsRecordSpecTemplateID"
Support Documents 950002 Clause 5.10.3 Operations record template, Table 120 – Operations record template relationship roles
Impacted Types B2MML- Common.xsd, complexType name="OperationsRecordTemplateType"