Open gerardmoloneyetpartners opened 1 year ago
Hi @Dennis-Brandl, you were a bit quick for me to get this bug documented before the recent update. Can we please get this also put into the V7.0.1 also. I'd really like to have this ready for our next project implementation so that the following will allow nested locations OpMaterialActualType for the StorageLocation OpEquipmentActualType for the OperationalLocation OpPhysicalAssetActualType for the PhysicalLocation
I will put this in on Friday and create the pull request. The change looks correct to me, and consistent with the ISA/IEC/ISO specification, so we can merge into V7.01 right away.
Dennis
Dennis Brandl
208 Townsend Ct, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518-8319, USA
+1-919-656-2205 (Mobile)
+1-832-201-0554 (Fax)
http://www.brlconsulting.com/ www.brlconsulting.com
***@***.***> ***@***.***
From: gerardmoloneyetpartners @.> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 9:59 PM To: MESAInternational/B2MML-BatchML @.> Cc: Dennis Brandl @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [MESAInternational/B2MML-BatchML] ResourceLocationType Child Relationship (Issue #82)
Hi @Dennis-Brandl https://github.com/Dennis-Brandl , you were a bit quick for me to get this bug documented before the recent update. Can we please get this also put into the V7.0.1 also. I'd really like to have this ready for our next project implementation so that the following will allow nested locations OpMaterialActualType for the StorageLocation OpEquipmentActualType for the OperationalLocation OpPhysicalAssetActualType for the PhysicalLocation
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MESAInternational/B2MML-BatchML/issues/82#issuecomment-1459237262 , or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEBIXAXGLVHRBXE6MS2BGFTW27YXHANCNFSM6AAAAAAVSH63FA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned. https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AEBIXAVTDZQMFBPC76753DLW27YXHA5CNFSM6AAAAAAVSH63FCWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTSW7IYY4.gif Message ID: @. @.> >
Currently, the B2MML-Common.xsd defines the ResourceLocationType as per below.
As there are certain objects (OperationalLocation, Equipment, PhysicalAsset) with the 'is made up of' relationship, I would like to see this updated to support this part of the ISA95 data models and suggest the update as a new line inserted at line 1642 as per below. I believe this would then support the ability to have these objects nested and reported appropriately.