search

MH42 / gwt-cal

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/gwt-cal
0 stars 0 forks source link

+n more issue when only MultiDays #25

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
In the MonthView, if a Day ONLY has MultiDayAppointment, the "+ n more" 
label doesn't appear

To Repeat:
Drag and drop a few multidays on a date that has no appointments, until 
there are more multi days than the cell can display. You will see no label 
appears.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Brad.Ryd...@gmail.com on 4 Feb 2010 at 6:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Some clarifications required. Starting point will be the attached OpenOffice
Presentation.

Original comment by carlos.m...@gmail.com on 5 Feb 2010 at 12:01

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I am checking-in a bug fix for this issue.

The code now displays a '+ n more' label at the bottom of days in the moth view 
even
when only multi-day (or all day) appointments exist for such day. 

Additional to the bug fix, the library is now showing the '+ n more' label only 
when
is necessary, i.e. if there are MORE than 4 appointments on a day (see
day_with_5_simple_day_appointments.png). If there are only four appointments on 
a
given day and the one of them is a simple appointment (not multi-day) instead of
showing an 'n + more' label, the simple appointment is shown without any '+ n 
more'
label (see day_with_4_simple_appointments.png and 3_multiday_1_simple.png).

This feature does not work with days with 4+ multi-day appointments (see
4_multiday_4th_not_shown.png) because we would have to assume that we can 
liberally
use the '+ n more' slot (the fourth -or last- row on each day) for the adjacent 
next
days which is something we are not sure about at the moment that the specific
arrangement for the multi-day appointments is taking place. 

I believe we can discuss workarounds for the limitation or provide some other 
visual
means to communicate what's going on with the appointments to the user.

Original comment by carlos.m...@gmail.com on 7 Feb 2010 at 3:46

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by carlos.m...@gmail.com on 8 Feb 2010 at 7:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Issue has been fixed.

Original comment by carlos.m...@gmail.com on 13 Feb 2010 at 6:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by Brad.Ryd...@gmail.com on 12 May 2010 at 7:11