Closed jmcvey3 closed 3 months ago
@browniea When you get a chance, see if this works for you. The range may still offset based on whatever the "bin1_dist_m" attribute, but that should be easily adjusted.
@jmcvey3 Looks like there is a conflict with the latest merge #286
Yeah that's annoying
The variable bin size is still being missed but the number of bins is right!
The variable bin size is still being missed but the number of bins is right!
Sweet. The data from the 0.12 m bins is stored in the variables with an "_sl" tag, so I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to write a function to combine these two. However, I don't think that function would belong in the reader, since the goal of the reader is to read what's in the datafile and do no more processing than necessary.
That makes sense and I agree. I can include that in my next example notebook for UMERC stuff.
That makes sense and I agree. I can include that in my next example notebook for UMERC stuff.
Great, yes I think that's a good idea, especially since TRDI is retiring the Workhorse line and pushing these newer instruments.
Introduces fixes for RDI files that contain changing "number of cells" and variable "cell sizes". The latter are bin-averaged into the largest cell size. Issue #291