Open ssolson opened 2 months ago
The metocean example pulls wind toolkit data and is pretty fast. We should look at replacing our test data with what's used in that example
I'm attempting to look into this today. I started testing locally but it seems like I'm already being rate limited.
My initial testing indicates that multiparameter requests are running as expected (the metocean example only does this), but for some reason multiyear and multilocation requests are very slow. I'll keep investigating this today and next week as the NREL server allows
Hopefully #315 shows some performance improvements. But in the typical manner of pulling this data, it was successful once locally and then downloads started hanging for long times.
The wind hindcast data currently takes greater than 3.5 hours to collect the needed data.
Can we get this down to 1 hr to be on par with the wave data?