Need a bit more granular control on inclusion of attributes in field name creation.
Currently have these configurations:
"exclude_attributes": [] <-- list of attributes to skip
"include_attributes": true <-- boolean to turn on/off attributes entirely
Was never happy with their inverse names, but not quite inverse behavior. What is also needed is a list of attributes to include, which might supplant include_attributes. Could call the high level include_all_attributes? But have the behavior be, if that is False, still listen to include_attributes list, the same way the inverse is true for True to all attributes, but exclude_attributes removes?
ghukill
commented
6 years ago
Need a bit more granular control on inclusion of attributes in field name creation.
Currently have these configurations:
Was never happy with their inverse names, but not quite inverse behavior. What is also needed is a list of attributes to include, which might supplant
include_attributes. Could call the high levelinclude_all_attributes? But have the behavior be, if that isFalse, still listen toinclude_attributeslist, the same way the inverse is true forTrueto all attributes, butexclude_attributesremoves?