search

MIERUNE / gtfs-parser

parse and aggregate GTFS
https://pypi.org/project/gtfs-parser/
MIT License
7 stars 1 forks source link

improve: migrate to Dataclass #8

Closed Kanahiro closed 4 months ago

Kanahiro commented 4 months ago

Close #0

Description（変更内容）

Manual Testing（手動テスト）

Not required / 不要

coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 months ago

ウォークスルー

GTFSデータ処理のためのPythonモジュールが大幅に更新されました。主な変更点は、データ構造へのアクセス方法の変更と関数ベースの設計からクラスベースの設計への移行です。これにより、コードの可読性と保守性が向上しています。

変更

ファイル 変更概要
.../aggregate.py, .../parse.py GTFS クラスインスタンスの使用とデータアクセス方法の変更
.../gtfs.py GTFS 関数から GTFS クラスへのリファクタリング、GTFSFactory 関数の導入
tests/... GTFSFactory の使用への更新、フィクスチャの設定変更

🐰✨ ぴょんぴょん跳ねる、コードの変更 新しいクラスで、データを綺麗に パーサー輝く、未来へと うさぎも喜ぶ、GTFSの春 🌸🚌💻

Recent Review Details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0466e08f99b9fd5dbe3743e4a3afc141836f86de and c7ac5302058442d956ed71f326b0d62ef8626f1c.
Files selected for processing (1) * gtfs_parser/gtfs.py (4 hunks)
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
codecov/patch success (17)
gtfs_parser/gtfs.py: [warning] 65-65: gtfs_parser/gtfs.py#L65 Added line #L65 was not covered by tests --- gtfs_parser/gtfs.py: [warning] 74-74: gtfs_parser/gtfs.py#L74 Added line #L74 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (2)
gtfs_parser/gtfs.py (2)
`16-37`: データクラス `GTFS` の実装を確認しました。属性の型指定が適切に行われており、オプショナルな属性には `Optional` 型が使用されています。これにより、型安全性が向上しています。 --- Line range hint `44-127`: `GTFSFactory` 関数のレビューを行いました。関数は適切にファイルを読み込み、データを解析し、エラー状態に対して例外を発生させます。また、データ型のキャストやデフォルト値の設定も行っています。ただし、一部の行がテストによってカバーされていないため、関数の信頼性を確保するためにこれらの行のテストを追加することをお勧めします。 ```diff # テストカバレッジが不足している行に対するテストケースを追加することを提案します。 ```
--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
codecov[bot] commented 4 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 18 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.50%. Comparing base (4f6c890) to head (c7ac530). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
gtfs_parser/aggregate.py 48.27% 15 Missing :warning:
gtfs_parser/gtfs.py 92.85% 2 Missing :warning:
gtfs_parser/parse.py 90.00% 1 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #8 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 78.82% 82.50% +3.67% ========================================== Files 8 8 Lines 255 280 +25 ========================================== + Hits 201 231 +30 + Misses 54 49 -5 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.