search

MISTLab / RangeTracker

Accurate position tracking with a single UWB anchor
35 stars 11 forks source link

please for experiment data #1

Closed qxiaofan closed 2 years ago

qxiaofan commented 3 years ago

Thanks for your paper 《Accurate position tracking with a single UWB anchor》,help me a lot.

beltrame commented 3 years ago

Unfortunately, I cannot understand what you are saying. Would it be possible to explain in English?

qxiaofan commented 3 years ago

Unfortunately, I cannot understand what you are saying. Would it be possible to explain in English?

I am so sorry, I have reverse my issues. Thanks for your work very much , it is very fantanstic.

scorpio-bza commented 3 years ago

@beltrame @yanjundream @ilpincy @ think in the process of studying your thesis, is the derivation of this place wrong in 《Accurate position tracking with a single UWB anchor》? image

scorpio-bza commented 3 years ago

Is it because I calculated the partial derivative wrong? This is my answer. Could you please tell me what is wrong with me? 38e713d41e7887d8ef5dd78185cf400(1)

yanjundream commented 3 years ago

Is it because I calculated the partial derivative wrong? This is my answer. Could you please tell me what is wrong with me? 38e713d41e7887d8ef5dd78185cf400(1)

@scorpio-bza Thank you for pointing this out. I have checked it and you are right. We probably made the typo or carelessly made the calculation wrong. However, as we consider the ∆t as a constant variable, the mistake won't affect the following analysis. Anyway, thank you for pointing this. We will correct it and submit a revision in the arxiv.

scorpio-bza commented 3 years ago

thank you very much

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "MISTLab/RangeTracker" @.>; 发送时间: 2021年6月14日(星期一) 上午9:39 @.>; @.**@.>; 主题: Re: [MISTLab/RangeTracker] please for experiment data (#1)

Is it because I calculated the partial derivative wrong? This is my answer. Could you please tell me what is wrong with me?

@scorpio-bza Thank you for pointing this out. I have checked it and you are right. We probably made the typo or carelessly made the calculation wrong. However, as we consider the ∆t as a constant variable, the mistake won't affect the following analysis. Anyway, thank you for pointing this. We will correct it and submit a revision in the arxiv.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.