Open theonesp opened 6 years ago
Yes, some hospitals are not available in the public subset for a variety of reasons.
There should be no problem with joining the hospitalid in this table to the patient table. But perhaps I am misunderstanding something.
I think it's more there is no point in having these hospitals in the table since they don't exist in the data.
I agree, it's confusing having different number of total hospitals depending on the table you are looking at, specially if some of them don't exist in the rest of the data.
Miguel
[image: MIT][image: imes]
*Miguel Ángel Armengol de la Hoz *✉ maarmeng@mit.edu / Senior Research Associate MIT - Institute for Medical Engineering and Science Laboratory for Computational Physiology MIT, E25-235- 53 Carleton St. Cambridge, MA 02139
[image: LinkedIn logo] https://www.linkedin.com/in/miguelangelarmengol/?locale=en_US
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Alistair Johnson notifications@github.com wrote:
I think it's more there is no point in having these hospitals in the table since they don't exist in the data.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MIT-LCP/eicu-website/issues/40#issuecomment-346488343, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH-Y_ncbmvbMU_SD9zP2uvSARsNfl-LTks5s5J33gaJpZM4QmoN8 .
The number of hospitals in the 'hospital' table is 459, nevertheless, there is no way to join the hospitals from this table with actual patients since this table only has 4 columns: hospitalid, numbedscategory, teachingstatus, region.
If we look in the 'patient' table and then the field hospitalid, it goes up to 364 unique hospitals.