Closed divyashan closed 3 years ago
Most likely one of two things: (1) they intended to write 1-3 and omitted the dash resulting in 13 (it seems too frequent for that), or (2) they wrote a value into the wrong field... also seems too frequent for that. Not sure!
Worth mentioning that this field was originally free-text. The deidentification of this field required values to be integers - but the original data allows for any free-text, e.g. here's a snippet (rounded to the nearest 100):
pain | n
----------------------------------------------------------+--------
0 | 164400
8 | 48100
10 | 47200
7 | 36400
5 | 33800
6 | 29100
9 | 23400
4 | 22800
3 | 18600
2 | 16000
| 14000
13 | 11700
1 | 6800
unable | 4000
uta | 2500
Critical | 2400
UTA | 2300
ua | 1400
UA | 600
c | 500
u/a | 400
unable | 300
Unable | 300
critical | 200
crit | 200
Non-verbal | 100
7.5 | 100
4-5 | 100
? | 100
9.5 | 100
o | 100
8.5 | 100
1-2 | 100
ett | 100
I realize now that I should have put ___
instead of NULL in this column to indicate that deid had been performed.
Prerequisites
Description
Looking at the pain field in the triage table, ~2.6% of the rows contain reported pain values > 10. About 97% of these rows have a pain value of exactly 13. Do you know what these higher pain values correspond to?
Thanks again for your work on this dataset!! It's great to work with.