Improve tagging of WFDB-compatible (and e.g. OMOP-compatible) datasets and software

[tompollard]

Another point from today's WFDB group meeting (and following some discussion between @peterhcharlton and @manlik-brownsrdr) was the suggestion that we should (1) make it easier for people to find and share "wfdb-compatible" software (2) improve motivation for people to share.

e.g. If I submit a new WFDB-compatible algorithm to PhysioNet, I should be able to:

• Understand what it means for my software to be WFDB-compatible
• Formally label my software as WFDB-compatible (e.g. with a tag/label)
• Allow others to easily discover the software on PhysioNet with a "WFDB tools" search.

All WFDB-compatible datasets should carry a similar WFDB-compatible label, so that it is easy to identify which algorithms can be used on which datasets. @bemoody @cx1111 @ikarosilva @manlik-brownsrdr @briangow

When implementing this approach, we may want to consider how the functionality can generalize beyond "WFDB". e.g. maybe the same general idea could apply to OMOP tools and data.

[alistairewj]

Maybe an editorial policy around certain keywords would be a good start?