Closed Cheppy closed 6 months ago
Please explain what you're trying to do. The change you're suggesting does not make any sense to me.
Please explain what you're trying to do. The change you're suggesting does not make any sense to me.
Greetings, what I am trying to do: There is open ECG database that is most commonly used to train datasets, or to check accuarcy of "own methods" for peak detection: https://www.physionet.org/content/mitdb/1.0.0/ The wfdb package currently only recognizes header files with the .hea extension, but the MIT-BIH database uses the .dat.hea format. To avoid renaming of headers or writing a script to rename them, I'm proposing a way to handle the case with .dat.hea files directly within wfdb. This will help saving time and effort for those working with that database. and i think it would be nice idea, because MIT-BIH is commonly used in many scientific papers. Maybe my way of handling that is too simple, but i hope you got the idea. What you think, should this case be added to wfdb?
Header files just have a .hea
extension - 100.dat.hea
is not valid. For example, the header file for record 100
is 100.hea
.
You can load this record using wfdb.rdrecord(record_name="100", pn_dir="mitdb/1.0.0")
.
Or, if you have downloaded the files 100.hea
and 100.dat
, you can use wfdb.rdrecord("100")
.
I don't know where you found ".dat.hea" files; there aren't any on PhysioNet.
this would save time when working locally with mit-bih database