Closed yumouwei closed 2 weeks ago
@crea-psfc is it worth analyzing the same for DIII-D, as well? or is that always returned by its efit nodename, so no issue there?
not aware of similar issues, but it's worth it to do a quick check. IMHO, EFIT is better maintained at DIII-D
Original problems
\efit_aeqdsk:betan
is undefined for pre-2000 shots.betan
computation incmod/efit.py
for pre-2000 shots written by someone, but the calculation is wrong.Implemented changes
get_beta_normalized
function incmod/physics.py
. This method takes in beta_t, ip, aminor, & btor data from EFIT and computes beta_n using the same formulation as\efit_aeqdsk:betan
. The output agrees with\efit_aeqdsk:betan
for post-2000 shots.betan
fetching & computation incmod/efit.py
.examples/efit.py
.