Hi @MJ10
I am very interested in your work and trying to reproduce the results, specifically for GFP (Table 3). Because some errors appeared when I ran run_gfp.py with the default parameters, I tried to change some of them to be the same as described in B.2. in the paper, but in turn found that the results were quite poor (avg. iter_1/collected_seqs_scores was about 1.42, far worse than the reported performance). Could you tell the exact parameters used for the experiments reported in the paper? The followings are the parameters I tried. Thank you.
Hi @MJ10 I am very interested in your work and trying to reproduce the results, specifically for GFP (Table 3). Because some errors appeared when I ran
run_gfp.py
with the default parameters, I tried to change some of them to be the same as described in B.2. in the paper, but in turn found that the results were quite poor (avg.iter_1/collected_seqs_scores
was about 1.42, far worse than the reported performance). Could you tell the exact parameters used for the experiments reported in the paper? The followings are the parameters I tried. Thank you.