For the time being, CORE-R5.xpr and CORE-R6.xpr should be identical. Yet, CORE-R6.xpr does not close timing (see screenshots), while `CORE-R5.xpr? does.
We need to investigate, if CORE-R6.xpr has a bug and/or how it is different from CORE-R5.xpr or why we don't get timing closure.
For the V5.1 release we did not use the bitstream generated by CORE-R6.xpr but copied the bitstream generated by CORE-R5.xpr, because for the time being both platforms are identical when it comes to the C64 core.
For the time being,
CORE-R5.xpr
andCORE-R6.xpr
should be identical. Yet,CORE-R6.xpr
does not close timing (see screenshots), while `CORE-R5.xpr? does.With this commit https://github.com/MJoergen/C64MEGA65/commit/81749eaba8db80b3f628f8959b207e29a0255589, we achieve timing closure on R6.
We need to investigate, if
CORE-R6.xpr
has a bug and/or how it is different fromCORE-R5.xpr
or why we don't get timing closure.For the V5.1 release we did not use the bitstream generated by
CORE-R6.xpr
but copied the bitstream generated byCORE-R5.xpr
, because for the time being both platforms are identical when it comes to the C64 core.