jdhughes-usgs
commented
6 months ago You could use multiple drain packages to represent drainage discharge, one of which could be to represent groundwater seepage. Each drain package would show up as a separate entry in the cell-by-cell file.
There is an option in the drain package so that it behaves identically to the groundwater seepage term in the UZF package. There is an example showing how to use thus option with a comparison to groundwater seepage calculated by the UZF Package (https://modflow6-examples.readthedocs.io/en/latest/_examples/ex-gwf-drn-p01.html), The details of the drainage option are given in the supplemental technical information document (mf6suptechinfo) provided with the release.
langevin-usgs
A lot of my models are used to evaluate irrigation of treated wastewater effluent on sprayfieds. One of the state Non-discharge Rule requirements is that the watertable has to remain at least 1 foot below land surface under all climatic ands irrigation conditions. Using the areas where seepage occurs is the fastest way for me ti estimate this for project scoping purposes. Otherwise I have to model the watertable elevations and subtract it from the land surface and map it, which I do for the final permitting of projects. I am able to model seepage to the surface and to drains separately in MFNWT but apparently cannot do so in MF6 So the solution seems to be to have MF6 UZF package include the sumulation of gw seepage and to write it out to the CBD file fo I can fetch it and map it