Closed aprovost-usgs closed 6 years ago
Chris followed up and confirmed with TB that the problem occurs only for the traditional budget file without the COMPACT option.
Essentially did what TB had suggested in pr_ProcessRecordHeaders. Successfully tested on a simple problem to make sure the CCB file was recognized as valid.
TB reported (email to modflow@usgs.gov 9/28/3018) a problem with cross-sectional models and proposed a solution:
I have found a problem with MODPATH v7.2.001. For cross-sectional models using 1 row and using the traditional CBB format, the test in subroutine pr_ProcessRecordHeaders fails to identify that it is a valid CBB file (as it fails the header%TextLabel(firstChar:lastChar) .eq. 'FLOW FRONT FACE', hasFlowFrontFace test) in BudgetReader.f90
Solution Rename hasFlowFrontFace to hasFlowFace Change if(header%TextLabel(firstChar:lastChar) .eq. 'FLOW FRONT FACE') then To if(header%TextLabel(firstChar:lastChar) .eq. 'FLOW FRONT FACE' .or. header%TextLabel(firstChar:lastChar) .eq. 'FLOW RIGHT FACE') then