Closed emorway-usgs closed 6 years ago
@jtwhite79 This issue should be resolved with commit d916dd4
Tested with multi-species version of the 'CrnkNic' test problem. Please confirm all looks OK with your real-world model and reopen the issue if something is still amiss.
Screen shot showing budget for second species in SFT:
SFT not properly accounting for multi-species. For example, compare the list files (*.m3d) from the two attached models, 1 and 2 species, respectively.
The following call in gnt1.f (line 39):
sends in numactive equal to the number of SFT cells. However,
CNEWSF
gets picked-up asx
andnumactive
gets picked up asn
. In xmdsolv.f, on line 1961, x is dimensioned asx(n)
, but this is a problem because CNEWSF is dimensioned asCNEWSF(1:650,1:2)
when it gets sent in, and so the second species is not properly accounted for.CrnkNic.zip