search

MODFLOW-USGS / mt3d-usgs

MT3D-USGS Repository
23 stars 12 forks source link

split uzt -> sft budget items in listing file #28

Closed emorway-usgs closed 6 years ago

emorway-usgs commented 6 years ago

Daniel Feinstein has requested that in the mass budgets for SFT, the mass contributed to streams from rejected infiltration be separated from groundwater discharge (springs) that makes its way to streams via the IRUNBND array (note: this is not referring to groundwater discharge through the streambed, rather spring flow directed to streams). Seems like a reasonable request. A model from Daniel to test this out with is attached.

NZ_exmp_mod_split_UZT-SFT_runoff_budg_itms.zip

langevin-usgs commented 6 years ago

One thing you might consider is doing an entire budget for SFT that is completely separate from the aquifer budget. This is how we do things in MODFLOW 6 for features that have their own mass balance calculations, such as lakes, streams, multi-aquifer wells, etc.

vivekbedekar commented 6 years ago

Chris, We are doing exactly that. SFT, LKT, CTS, UZT(Eric?) all these packages have their own separate budgets written to the out file. This issue was just to split the currently lumped UZT to SFT terms into individual components (rejected recharge, groundwater discharge).

Vivek

Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36

From: langevin-usgs notifications@github.com Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 7:57:20 AM To: langevin-usgs/mt3d-usgs Cc: vivekbedekar; Assign Subject: Re: [langevin-usgs/mt3d-usgs] split uzt -> sft budget items in listing file (#28)

One thing you might consider is doing an entire budget for SFT that is completely separate from the aquifer budget. This is how we do things in MODFLOW 6 for features that have their own mass balance calculations, such as lakes, streams, multi-aquifer wells, etc.

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/langevin-usgs/mt3d-usgs/issues/28#issuecomment-358959432, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADuIyKSPkydUJLKa424cmEVsUhc0_BOwks5tMJEwgaJpZM4RjZ5l.

rniswon commented 6 years ago

That makes sense to me, also this is how it is done for UZF, Lak, and Sfr.

On Jan 19, 2018, at 4:57 AM, langevin-usgs notifications@github.com wrote:

One thing you might consider is doing an entire budget for SFT that is completely separate from the aquifer budget. This is how we do things in MODFLOW 6 for features that have their own mass balance calculations, such as lakes, streams, multi-aquifer wells, etc.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

emorway-usgs commented 6 years ago

Fix offered with commit f1e0110