Closed relet closed 8 years ago
Just to clarify:
I guess by " interface names are a poor identifier" you mean on the database side, ie when we store the experiment result. For setting up and starting the experiment/container interface name is still preferred I guess.
2016-04-26 8:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Hirsch notifications@github.com:
Assigned #2 https://github.com/MONROE-PROJECT/Experiments/issues/2 to @jonakarl https://github.com/jonakarl.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/MONROE-PROJECT/Experiments/issues/2#event-641051212
Jonas Karlsson Senior Research Engineer
Karlstad University SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden Telephone: +46 54 700 15 64 Mobile: +46 70 672 06 20 Skype: karlsson.karl.jonas Hangout: karlsson.karl.jonas
twitter.com/kau facebook.com/karlstadsuniversitet KAU.SE
Yes, I agree. I only meant the reporting of results.
Closed by commit #6
As we discussed prior to and during the demo, interface names are a poor identifier for the connection used.
My suggestion would be to use the InterfaceId that is provided by metadata (which maps to the IMEI for modems, MAC for wifi and fixed links), and to also include the operator MCC/MNC in all results.
This issue affects all current experiments, and has to be matched on the database side.