Closed matthewhoffman closed 6 years ago
@matthewhoffman, if you want this fully automated with JIGSAW you could use a similar workflow to the one I used in https://github.com/MPAS-Dev/MPAS/pull/1492 to call JIGSAW directly.
I'm thinking we want some type of standard to facilitate this in the long term.
Thanks @pwolfram - good to note that. For the purposes of this mesh, simply dumping it in the repo for future reference is sufficient, but in the long run I could imagine building an automated test around it, especially if we are able to remove the Matlab wrapper from around JIGSAW (e.g. replace with python). But we won't want that kind of usage for awhile (timescale of many months).
After changes to EISMINT1 setup, new stats are:
====================================
Max modeled thickness (m) = 2976.68217741
EISMINT models ice thickness at divide (m):
3d models (10 of them): 2978.0 +/- 19.3
2d models (3 of them): 2982.2 +/- 26.4
====================================
====================================
Basal homologous temperature at divide (deg C) = -13.0860572743
EISMINT models basal temperature at divide (m):
3d models (6 of them): -13.34 +/- 0.56
====================================
This merge updates two test cases.
New model config options added to support temperature test for EISMINT1: