Closed bradh closed 6 days ago
Nit:
- for (i=0; i<num_operating_points, i++)
+ for (i=0; i<num_operating_points; i++)
Nit:
- for (i=0; i<num_operating_points, i++) + for (i=0; i<num_operating_points; i++)
Indeed. Updated the report.
This bug has already been fixed in 14496-15 7th Edition. Closing the issue.
(Edit to fix typo)
In the syntax for
OperatingPointRecord
(ISO/IEC 14496-15:2022 Section 9.6.2.2), the loop for operating points isfor (i=0; i<num_operating_points) ...
. I think that should befor (i=0; i<num_operating_points; i++) ...
(I do not have permission to add labels, so added it to the title - if adding a label, please edit that).