MPEGGroup / OpenFontFormat

Official MPEG repository to discuss issues on Open Font Format (ISO/IEC 14496-22)
32 stars 6 forks source link

Proposed amendment to 7.2.3 needs improvement. #34

Closed PeterConstable closed 3 years ago

PeterConstable commented 4 years ago

The WD currently states wrt 7.2.3:

Add the following text after the first four paragraphs (prior to ItemVariationStore table description):

The topic of new section Associating target items... is generic, which is reasonable. But that scope would include content currently discussed in the fourth paragraph, so that paragraph (or a revision of it) should follow the new heading.

Secondly, the wording currently proposed to be added after that heading focuses only on the new structures related to COLR v1. To make the section reflect the general scope suggested by the heading, it should represent the different ways used to associate target items with variation data in comparable ways.

For these reasons, I suggest that the changes in 7.2.3 should include the revisions I included in otvarcommonformats_draft_200928_delta-from-183.pdf (see #20).

This includes a revision of the fourth paragraph along with other inserted text.

Thus, I would suggest the proposed amendment say,

Replace the fourth paragraph of 7.2.3 ("Variation data is comprised...") with the following text:

And that the proposed replacement text include the revised paragraph and following bullet points that are shown in otvarcommonformats_draft_200928_delta-from-183.pdf.

vlevantovsky commented 4 years ago

The working draft in it's current form contains the contents that were part of the original input contribution (which was based on the original COLR v1 proposal and did not include revisions you summarized in otvarcommonformats_draft), and editorial language added to give at least a minimal level of descriptive text, with the goal that this will be revised later. Any revisions are possible and very much welcome, we just need to prepare and submit them as input contribution to the WG. I am happy to use the language you proposed, if there are no objections to it.

vlevantovsky commented 3 years ago

Resolved as part of the ISO/IEC 14496-22:2019 Working Draft AMD2, closing the issue.