search

MPEGGroup / OpenFontFormat

Official MPEG repository to discuss issues on Open Font Format (ISO/IEC 14496-22)
31 stars 6 forks source link

README: better explain relationship of repo/list #5

Closed davelab6 closed 3 years ago

davelab6 commented 4 years ago

Please don't merge yet, will edit after there's more clarity on this

stuaxo commented 3 years ago

In my last contract we used "WIP" in the ticket description to say "don't merge this" having a "work in progress" label could work here.

alerque commented 3 years ago

@stuaxo Draft PR's are a relatively new tool in the GitHub toolbox. There is no need for WIP titles, descriptions, or labels. Draft PR's don't have a merge button and they cannot be merged until somebody with the right powers (the same powers that could edit the title or change the labels) marks them as ready for review.

stuaxo commented 3 years ago

Fantastic :) tbh I'm having trouble keeping up with all the new things being added to github.

davelab6 commented 3 years ago

@vlevantovsky I'm sure I got some details wrong but I'd be grateful if you could take a look :)

davelab6 commented 3 years ago

I've enabled edits by maintainers so you can correct the file on my fork's branch directly.

davelab6 commented 3 years ago

Thanks for the corrections Vlad! I'd like to take one more pass on this before you merge, by EOW.

davelab6 commented 3 years ago

Note to self, John Hudson posted some stuff on the list relevant to this that I want to pull in

Also useful details in https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/2016-February/000674.html

Also perhaps worth moving to a /CONTRIBUTING.md file

Also note proposal format recommendations at https://github.com/MPEGGroup/OpenFontFormat/issues/17#issuecomment-699532588

simoncozens commented 3 years ago

This is brilliant, and adds a lot more clarity to expectations around how changes to the standard (ought to) happen.

davelab6 commented 3 years ago

@vlevantovsky would you like any more changes before merging this? In happy to see it go up and I'll follow up with a second PR with other details later? :)

vlevantovsky commented 3 years ago

If no objections were raised, or if all objections were retraced, ...

Did you really mean to say "retraced", or "retracted"?

davelab6 commented 3 years ago

Typo