Closed kephale closed 8 months ago
Very open! Do you want to make an PR? Otherwise i can do it in the next days.
22.02.2024 17:38:01 Kyle I S Harrington @.***>:
Would folks be open to switching the headers from containing the entire license text to something more concise like SPDX-License-Identifier headers?
https://spdx.org/licenses/MPL-2.0.html
It would simplify to something like:
# SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0 This would make it a lot easier to navigate the source code.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub[https://github.com/MPI-Dortmund/tomotwin-cryoet/issues/95], or unsubscribe[https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIP66JSIWPBPQ2HMUOKYZDYU5X6PAVCNFSM6AAAAABDVI4BM2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGE2DSNBXGUYTINY]. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. [Verfolgungsbild][https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAIP66O4HHOPTKRBSXSGRNLYU5X6PA5CNFSM6AAAAABDVI4BM2WGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNFJFZXG5LFVJRW63LNMVXHIX3JMTHIAHTDJM.gif]
Happy to submit the PR!
Would folks be open to switching the headers from containing the entire license text to something more concise like SPDX-License-Identifier headers?
https://spdx.org/licenses/MPL-2.0.html
It would simplify to something like:
This would make it a lot easier to navigate the source code.